« Tomorrow's session on unbundling | Main | Buy Low, Sell High »

December 13, 2005

Comments

Jamie Notter

Thanks, Jeff, for posting this.

There was one particular point in the discussion that really interested me, and it addressed the issue of “control.” The old model is: do a survey to ask people what they want and then take time to create that and present it back to them as a bundled package. The new model involves rapid prototyping. Put stuff out, get the feedback immediately and either pull it back or modify and send a new one out (depending on the feedback).

But this still requires discipline, intention, and choice. It’s not just that you prototype EVERYTHING so that you can offer everything and take advantage of the “long tail.”

You still need leadership and intention and clarity. You can be more active because you have integrated the member’s or customer’s feedback more closely into your decision process, but you still must decide.

What is different, from my perspective, is the reduction of “control.” With prototyping you make choices, but they are less constraining. Choices are an indication of direction, not a description of a final destination. The destination is no longer completely in your control. I think that will be tough for current model associations to swallow, but I think it is integral to their future success.

Thanks for leading the discussion.

Ben Martin

I'm looking forward to listening to this -- when I can find an hour and ten minutes! Personally, I have negative feelings about unbundling. However, introducing bundles might be a way to produce an unbundled product line.

One challenge we're facing in regards to generating content from the fringes (and I'm confident others are, too) is the lack of member engagement. How can content be generated from the outside, when members are too busy, apathetic or under-confident to create it? How much "responsibility" (as you say) does management have to elicit content from the unwilling or unable "edges?" And what priority does this take in relation to other important initiatives?

Nick

Hey all - I listened to the conversation and I couldn't help but thinking about the generational aspect to all of this. I mean, sure eventually these technologies will be commonplace, but at what point should an organization who's mainly boomers take up these technologies in order to appeal to the younguns? (Of course I'm generalizing about age, but statistically, you follow what I'm saying.) I mean, I still have people telling me "I don't do the computer." I commented over at Ben's place a little as well on the subject.

I just heard something yesterday that said we're moving from a world where the big eat the small to a world where the fast eat the slow. I agree with that--and I see it happening--but yet, to what extent should all of the "disruptive" techologies inform what we do on a day-to-day basis? My personal thought is that associations should stop selling the good-old-individuals' club and focus on what they do best: credentialing and advocacy. Let's face it, associations are potentially huge, huge losers in all of this. I love the association model, but seriously, like you all said in the convo, the leaders have to realize what's going on and facilitate the change, or their organizations will be irrelevant as soon as all the boomers retire.

Paul Goodson

Jeff, Thanks so much for posting this audio of the recent Executive Foresight Conversation. After participating in the last two conversations, I was unable to call in for this one on Unbundling. I have just finished listening to the audio of this conversation and found it to be very thought provoking, as have the earlier ones. I have been challenged to learn more about the "social media" and explore ways to utilize it to more effectively facilitate member participation and contribution to and their inclusion, acceptance and recognition by their communities of interest. Thanks again for facilitating the conversation itself and the audio to allow those who missed the call to benefit as well. Paul

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment